
By Stanislav Dashevskyi, Achim D. Brucker, and Fabio Massacci.
The work presented in this paper is motivated by the need to estimate the security effort of maintaining Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) components within the software supply chain of a large international software vendor. We investigated publicly available factors (from number of active users to commits, from code size to usage of popular programming languages, etc.) to identify which ones impact three potential effort models: centralized (the company checks each component and propagates changes to the product groups), distributed (each product group is in charge of evaluating and fixing its consumed FOSS components), and hybrid (seldom used components are checked individually by each development team, the rest is centralized). We use Grounded Theory to extract the factors from a six months study at the vendor. We report the results on a sample of 166 FOSS components used by the vendor.
Keywords: Free and Open Source Software, Software Vulnerabilities, Security Maintenance
Please cite this work as follows: S. Dashevskyi, A. D. Brucker, and F. Massacci, “On the effort for security maintenance of open source components,” 2018. Author copy: http://logicalhacking.com/publications/dashevskyi.ea-foss-efforts-2018/
@InProceedings{ dashevskyi.ea:foss-efforts:2018,
author = {Stanislav Dashevskyi and Achim D. Brucker and Fabio
Massacci},title = {On the Effort for Security Maintenance of Open Source
Components},booktitle = {Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (WEIS)},
location = {Innsbruck, Austria},
year = {2018},
areas = {software, security},
abstract = {The work presented in this paper is motivated by the need to
estimate the security effort of maintaining Free and Open
Source Software (FOSS) components within the software supply
chain of a large international software vendor. We
investigated publicly available factors (from number of active
users to commits, from code size to usage of popular
programming languages, etc.) to identify which ones impact
three potential effort models: centralized (the company checks
each component and propagates changes to the product groups),
distributed (each product group is in charge of evaluating and
fixing its consumed FOSS components), and hybrid (seldom used
components are checked individually by each development team,
the rest is centralized). We use Grounded Theory to extract
the factors from a six months study at the vendor. We report
the results on a sample of 166 FOSS components used by the
vendor.},keywords = {Free and Open Source Software, Software Vulnerabilities,
Security Maintenance},note = {Author copy: \url{http://logicalhacking.com/publications/dashevskyi.ea-foss-efforts-2018/}},
}