
By Achim D. Brucker, Frédéric Tuong, and Burkhart Wolff.
The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is one of the few modeling languages that is widely used in industry. While UML is mostly known as diagrammatic modeling language (e.g., visualizing class models), it is complemented by a textual language, called Object Constraint Language (OCL). OCL is based on a three-valued logic that turns UML into a formal language. Unfortunately the semantics of this specification language, captured in the Annex A of the OCL standard, leads to different interpretations of corner cases. We formalize the core of OCL: denotational definitions, a logical calculus and operational rules that allow for the execution of OCL expressions by a mixture of term rewriting and code compilation. Our formalization reveals several inconsistencies and contradictions in the current version of the OCL standard. Overall, this document is intended to provide the basis for a machine-checked text Annex A of the OCL standard targeting at tool implementors.
Please cite this work as follows: A. D. Brucker, F. Tuong, and B. Wolff, “Featherweight OCL: A proposal for a machine-checked formal semantics for OCL 2.5,” Archive of Formal Proofs, Jan. 2014. https://www.isa-afp.org/entries/Featherweight_OCL.shtml, Formal proof development. Author copy: http://logicalhacking.com/publications/brucker.ea-featherweight-2014/
@Article{ brucker.ea:featherweight:2014,
author = {Achim D. Brucker and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Tuong and Burkhart
Wolff},title = {{Featherweight} {OCL}: A Proposal for a Machine-Checked
Formal Semantics for {OCL} 2.5},journal = {Archive of Formal Proofs},
month = {jan},
year = {2014},
note = {\url{https://www.isa-afp.org/entries/Featherweight_OCL.shtml},
Formal proof development. \url{http://logicalhacking.com/publications/brucker.ea-featherweight-2014/}},
Author copy: issn = {2150-914x},
abstract = {The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is one of the few
modeling languages that is widely used in industry. While UML
is mostly known as diagrammatic modeling language (e.g.,
visualizing class models), it is complemented by a textual
language, called Object Constraint Language (OCL). OCL is
based on a three-valued logic that turns UML into a formal
language. Unfortunately the semantics of this specification
language, captured in the Annex A of the OCL standard, leads
to different interpretations of corner cases. We formalize the
core of OCL: denotational definitions, a logical calculus and
operational rules that allow for the execution of OCL
expressions by a mixture of term rewriting and code
compilation. Our formalization reveals several inconsistencies
and contradictions in the current version of the OCL standard.
Overall, this document is intended to provide the basis for a
machine-checked text Annex A of the OCL standard targeting at
tool implementors.},filelabel = {Outline},
file = {download/2014/brucker.ea-featherweight-outline-2014.pdf},
areas = {formal methods, software},
}